[Enter Report Title]
[Enter Report Subtitle Identifying the Type of Rapid Review]
Date of Literature Search: Click or tap to enter a date. Date of Submission: Click or tap to enter a date.

Prepared By: [Click to Enter Author(s) Information] Contact: [Click to Enter Corresponding Author Information Email: [Enter Email] Suggested citation: [Click to provide suggested citation]

Land Acknowledgement(s)

SPOR Evidence Alliance operates from the St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto which is located on the traditional land of the Huron-Wendat, the Seneca, and the Mississaugas of the Credit. Today, this meeting place is still the home to many Indigenous people from across Turtle Island.

We are grateful to have the opportunity to work on these lands.

Funding Acknowledgement(s)

The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Evidence Alliance (SPOR EA) is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) initiative.

[INSERT ANY ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES]

Project Contributors

List full name, affiliation, and role. Please include trainees, patient partners, decision-makers, and subject matter experts, as applicable.

Third-Party Materials

If you wish to reuse non-textual material from this report that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is required for such use and to obtain necessary permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned material rests solely with the user.

General Disclaimer

This report was prepared by [INSERT INVESTIGATIVE TEAM INFO] on behalf of the SPOR Evidence Alliance. It was developed through the analysis, interpretation and synthesis of scientific research and/or health technology assessments published in peer-reviewed journals, institutional websites and other distribution channels. It also incorporates selected information provided by experts and patient/citizen partners with lived experience on the subject matter. This document may not fully reflect all the scientific evidence available at the time this report was prepared. Other relevant scientific findings may have been reported since completion of this synthesis report.

The SPOR Evidence Alliance and the project team make no warranty, express or implied, nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, data, product, or process disclosed in this report. Conclusions drawn from or actions undertaken on the basis of, information included in this report are the sole responsibility of the user.

Table of Contents

Land Acknowledgement(s)	i

Funding Acknowledgement(s)	i

Project Contributors	i

Abbreviations and Definitions	iv

Abbreviations	iv

Key Definitions:	iv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	v

Introduction	1

Methods	1

Results	1

Discussion	1

Conclusion	1

References	3

Abbreviations and Definitions

(This section is optional, but recommended for technical reports.)

Abbreviations

ABC	Text here

DEF	Text here

GHI	Text here

JKL	Text here

MNO	Text here

PQR	Text here

STU	Text here

VWX	Text here

YZ	Text here

Key Definitions:

Word: Per et graeci verterem, agam fuisset ut vel. Nec argumentum contentiones no, tantas ignota mei te, vis natum legimus te. Usu in enim eros. Pro mutat insolens oportere no, est ne iisque deserunt.

Word: Mel quem alienum ne, te eum tation everti. Ut per paulo fierent efficiendi. Per in facilisi necessitatibus. Eu aliquid reprehendunt est. Graeci commune quo ut.

Word: In duo quas phaedrum, virtute nonumes posidonium at eam, nec in sint patrioque adversarium. Prompta delicata ne duo. Duo nihil eirmod interpretaris id, ei admodum instructior his. Nusquam blandit ad has. Nisl explicari vix et, in debet vocibus voluptua eum. Ea vim albucius dissentiet, quo veri voluptatibus ne. Et eam porro sadipscing reformidans, mei et deleniti laboramus repudiandae, pro gubergren aliquando no.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This should not be longer than 1-2 pages and should include the following:

Objectives: A clear statement of the study purpose and research question.

Design: Study design used to address the research question.

Method: Brief description of the method used.

Results: Key findings of the review. Feel free to include graphics here.

Conclusion: primary conclusions and their implications, suggest areas for further research if appropriate. Do not go beyond the data in the article.

Protocol/Topic Registration: Where applicable, please provide the registration number or link to the protocol/topic.

Introduction

Please provide a background to the research question being studied and rationale for the present study.

Clearly state the research question using the population/problem, interventions/exposure, comparisons, outcomes, study design, and time (PICOST) framework or other relevant key elements used to conceptualize the review question.

Methods

Where applicable, please provide the protocol or topic registration details and links.

Eligibility Criteria – clearly define the eligibility criteria.

Sources of data – please list all databases and other sources of data (e.g., bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, grey literature sources, focus groups, key informant interviews).

Data collection – provide details on how information will be searched and who will perform the search, data elements to be collected, who will responsible for collecting the data, will specific training be required prior to data collection, specific forms or tools to be used to collect the data, whether the study requires REB approval, how will information be verified for accuracy, where and how information will be stored.

Data analysis and synthesis – please describe how data will be analyzed, interpreted, and presented (e.g., tables, graphs)

Please also describe any sex and gender or additional equity considerations (e.g., age, income, ethnocultural backgrounds, Indigenous status, languages spoken, geographic location, ability/disability) to the study design.

Results

Report your sample size (e.g., number of studies includes, number of interview conducted).

Provide summary statistics.

Present all results of all analysis using tables and figures.

Discussion

Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups. Also

Discuss the strengths and limitations of the study approach.

Conclusion

Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well as potential implications for health systems decision-making.

References